MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1795381979 · doi:10.1186/1532-429x-17-s1-o31

The prognostic value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in aborted sudden cardiac death

2015· article· en· W1795381979 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter Swoboda, Ananth Kidambi, John Gierula, Adam K McDiarmid, Bara Erhayiem, Laura E Dobson, Tarique A Musa, David P Ripley, Pankaj Garg, Klaus K. Witte, John P. Greenwood, Sven Plein

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBritish Heart Foundation
KeywordsMedicineAngiologyCardiologyInternal medicineVentricular tachycardiaMagnetic resonance imagingSudden cardiac deathCardiac magnetic resonanceCardiac magnetic resonance imagingImplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aborted sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a common indication for CMR. No studies have investigated the prognostic value of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) solely in patients with secondary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) or aborted SCD. 58 consecutive patients who had CMR and ICD implantation after aborted SCD between 2006 and 2013 were identified. Clinical notes and CMR results were reviewed. Patients were scanned with a CMR protocol that included a short axis cine stack and LGE imaging. CMR images were analysed blinded to clinical data using standard software (cvi42, Circle CVI, Canada). Patients were followed up after ICD implantation at six weeks, three months and six months and then every six months. Appropriate ICD therapy was defined as any anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) or shock therapy delivered for a ventricular arrhythmia. Follow up data was available on 55/58 patients. Four patients died during the follow up period and one patient was lost to follow up 14 days post-implantation. Median follow up was 791 days (interquartile range 370-1142 days). 11 patients had appropriate ICD therapy. 6 had ATP only and 5 had appropriate shocks ±ATP for ventricular arrhythmias. The clinical aetiology of the aborted SCD was ischaemic heart disease (IHD) 24, primary arrhythmia 14, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy 7, dilated cardiomyopathy 6, myocarditis 2 and other 5. Of 55 patients on whom clinical outcome data was available 20 patients had ejection fraction (EF)<35% and 35 had EF>35%. 5/20 (25%) of those with EF<35% had appropriate ICD therapies and 6/35 (17%) of those with EF>35% had appropriate ICD therapies on follow up. There was no significant difference in the likelihood ratio (LR) of appropriate therapy using an EF cutoff of 35% (LR 0.48, P=0.49), confirmed on log rank analysis of Kaplan Meier curves (figure 1 ) (P=0.32). Kaplan Meier curves showing freedom from appropriate ICD therapy with patients stratified according to presence of LGE (above) and EF (below). Each horizontal line represents a censored subject. Of the 52 patients who had LGE imaging and clinical outcome data 32 had LGE present and 20 had no LGE. 10/32 (31%) LGE +ve patients had appropriate ICD therapies on follow up and only 1/20 (5%) LGE-ve patients had appropriate ICD therapies. LGE +ve patients were significantly more likely to have an appropriate ICD therapy on follow up (LR 5.97, P=0.015), confirmed on log rank analysis of Kaplan Meier curves (P=0.036). In patients who have suffered aborted SCD, CMR is able to identify patients at risk of future arrhythmic events according to the presence or absence of LGE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonanceSame topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasFrench-language works237,207