MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1795444918

Absurdity Theme in Eugene O’Neill’s Middle Period Works:Take The Hairy Ape as an Example

2010· article· en· W1795444918 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiaoping Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in literature and language · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbsurdityTheme (computing)HumanityDignityPeriod (music)LonelinessAlienationAbsurdismLiteraturePhilosophyAestheticsMaterialismHistoryPsychoanalysisArtLawTheologyPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In O’Neill’s eyes, the mechanized industrial process of the materialistic America distorted man’s spirit and divorced man from the qualities of humanity which gave him dignity and the sense of manhood. As a modern tragedian, O’Neill expressed his doubt of the mechanized society and tried to disclose the awkward situation of modern man. His description of loneliness and alienation of modern man in The Hairy Ape echoes the same theme in the theatre of the absurd.Key words:  Eugene O’Neill; The Hairy Ape; Absurdity Theme

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0230.040
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in literature and languageSame topicCultural Studies and Interdisciplinary ResearchFrench-language works237,207