Bibliographic record
Abstract
Em face de certas pressuposições globalizantes da apropriação norte- americana da Afro-Brazilian religion, levanto uma pergunta hipotética: que diferença faria se – em vez do candomblé servir como o exemplo universal e transnacional do sincretismo religioso – a umbanda servisse como um exemplo do hibridismo cultural brasileiro? Sugiro a elaboração de um conceito específico – o ‘hibridismo de refração’ – no qual, o espectro de umbandas refrata o espectro de tensões sociais na sociedade brasileira. Com referência à teoria recente da globalização, argumento que a variação interna da umbanda reflete uma variedade de apropriações estratégicas de conceitos e modelos nacionais e transnacionais. Isto afirma a autonomia contextualizada desses agentes religiosos brasileiros e necessita uma dimensão nacional em qualquer análise das tensões constitutivas desta espécie de glocalização.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".