MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1797017151 · doi:10.5555/2011814.2011818

An O(m 2 )-depth quantum algorithm for the elliptic curve discrete logarithm problem over GF(2 m ) a

2009· article· en· W1797017151 on OpenAlexaff
Dmitri Maslov, Jimson Mathew, Donny Cheung, Dhiraj K. Pradhan

Bibliographic record

VenueQuantum Information and Computation · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsElliptic curve point multiplicationElliptic curveDiscrete logarithmLogarithmQuantum algorithmHomogeneous coordinatesAlgorithmQuantumPolynomialDiscrete mathematicsQuantum computerPost-quantum cryptographyTripling-oriented Doche–Icart–Kohel curveSchoof's algorithmMathematical analysisPure mathematicsComputer sciencePublic-key cryptographyPhysicsQuantum mechanicsQuarter period

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider a quantum polynomial-time algorithm which solves the discrete logarithmproblem for points on elliptic curves over GF(2m). We improve over earlier algorithmsby constructing an efficient circuit for multiplying elements of binary finite fields andby representing elliptic curve points using a technique based on projective coordinates.The depth of our proposed implementation, executable in the Linear Nearest Neighbor(LNN) architecture, is O(m2), which is an improvement over the previous bound ofO(m3) derived assuming no architectural restrictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuantum Information and ComputationSame topicCryptography and Residue ArithmeticFrench-language works237,207