MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1797256294 · doi:10.1109/mse.1999.787012

Supporting Canadian University interests in microelectronics and microsystems

2003· article· en· W1797256294 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Douglas S. Gale, A. Marsh, Michael L. Moore

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCMC Microsystems
KeywordsMicroelectronicsMicrosystemEngineeringFabricationCMOSManufacturing engineeringSystems engineeringEngineering managementComputer scienceElectrical engineeringNanotechnologyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canadian universities take advantage of infrastructure tuned to their interests in microelectronics and related disciplines, for example, design flows targeting 0.25-micron CMOS. A range of methodology and fabrication options is available and continues to evolve rapidly with considerable encouragement from industrial partners.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.654

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0100.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1960.030

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207