MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1797373662 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2005.1466040

A 0.35μ CMOS Comparator Circuit For High-Speed ADC Applications

2005· article· en· W1797373662 on OpenAlexaff
Samad Sheikhaei, Shahriar Mirabbasi, A. Ivanov

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComparatorPreamplifierComparator applicationsCMOSVoltageElectrical engineeringFlash ADCSIGNAL (programming language)Electronic engineeringDynamic rangePhysicsComputer scienceEngineeringAmplifier

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A high-speed differential clocked comparator circuit is presented. The comparator consists of a preamplifier and a latch stage followed by a dynamic latch that operates as an output sampler. The output sampler circuit consists of a full transmission gate (TG) and two inverters. The use of this sampling stage results in a reduction in the power consumption of this high-speed comparator. Simulations show that charge injection of the TG adds constructively to the sampled signal value, therefore amplifying the sampled signal with a modest gain of 1.15. Combined with the high gain of the inverters, the sampled signals are amplified toward the rail voltages. This comparator is designed and fabricated in a 0.35 /spl mu/m standard digital CMOS technology. Measurement results show a sampling frequency of 1 GHz with 16 mV resolution for a 1 V input signal range and 2 mW power consumption from a 3.3 V supply. The architecture can be scaled down to smaller feature sizes and lower supply voltages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207