MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1798653705 · doi:10.14244/1982719945

A infância sob o olhar da expertise medical: 1930-1970 (Tradução)

2009· article· pt· W1798653705 on OpenAlexaffabout
Louise Hamelin Brabant

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Eletrônica de Educação · 2009
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Education Studies Worldwide
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesIntervention (counseling)SociologyEarly childhood educationGRASPEarly childhoodPedagogyPsychologyNursingMedicineDevelopmental psychologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given the way the culture of industrial society has influenced professional expertise, we can ourselves ask how the rational intervention of specialist has contributed to the social construction of the child. The purpose of this paper   is outline the two medical models that defined childhood in Quebec, Canada between 1930-1970 as well to grasp their influence. The key point of his analysis is to show how scientific knowledge progressively became the reference in childhood education. Key words : Childhood, social representation,   medical discourse, childhood education

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Eletrônica de EducaçãoSame topicHistorical Education Studies WorldwideFrench-language works237,207