MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1800945993 · doi:10.1520/stp14995s

SIDD Installation and Direct Design for Reinforced Concrete Low-Head Pressure Pipe

2000· book-chapter· en· W1800945993 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
FJ Heger

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHead (geology)Pressure headStructural engineeringEngineeringForensic engineeringGeologyMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the principal technical provisions in a proposed ASCE Standard Practice for the Direct Design of Buried Reinforced Concrete Low-Head Pressure Pipe using the same new standard installations (SIDD) as recommended in ASCE 15–93, Standard Practice for Direct Design of Buried Precast Concrete Pipe Using Standard Installations (for reinforced concrete gravity flow pipe). The proposed standard practice defines installation requirements and structural analyses for moment, thrust, and shear produced by external loads that are the same as given in ASCE-15. It incorporates design procedures for combined circumferential tension produced by internal pressure and flexure produced by external loads that are essentially in compliance with both ASTM C361 and AWWA C302 and as recommended in AWWA Manual M9. These provisions and the cited referenced standards use load factors that are larger than those used in various standards for direct design of gravity flow pipe and they further limit the maximum combined stress in the reinforcement by inclusion of a limiting maximum design yield strength of 40,000 psi, regardless of the actual yield strength of the reinforcement. There are further limits on the reinforcement stress produced by internal pressure alone as well as on the tensile stress in the uncracked concrete pipe wall that are essentially the same as given in the above standards for low-head pressure pipe. In addition to providing the requirements and structural effects of SIDD installations, the proposed standard fills a gap in the existing standards for design of low-head concrete pipe by incorporating rational methods for calculating radial tension and shear strengths. Radial tension strength is required to resist the bending moments at the crown and invert produced by external loads. The presence of internal pressure does not increase the required radial tension strength, and the same methods used for gravity flow pipe may be used for determining the radial tension strength of low-head pressure pipe. Shear strength is another matter. The circumferential tension produced by internal pressure produces a significant effect on shear strength. Research by Dr. M. P. Collins and coworkers in Canada is the basis for new more rational procedures for shear strength of flexural members in the AASHTO LRFD Highway Bridge Specification. These are adopted and simplified for use over the range of wall thickness and strain variations applicable to low-head pressure pipe so that for the first time a rational procedure is available in the proposed standard to calculate the shear strength of low-head concrete pipe. Application of the new procedure to pipe designs for the higher fill heights combined with the highest pressure limits in the design tables of ASTM C361 indicates an adequate factor of safety for those designs, including adequate shear strength.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresFrench-language works237,207