Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce texte suggère que les conceptions de la folie fluctuent avec les cadres sociaux, les valeurs dominantes de chaque communauté culturelle et les positions qu'occupent agents et intervenants dans le champ et la hiérarchie des savoirs. En tant qu'objet de représentations et de stratégies cognitives, la folie peut être considérée comme un « symptôme » des partis-pris « normatifs » et « réducteurs » de chaque époque mais aussi comme un révélateur de la sensibilité de chaque peuple à certaines dimensions du vécu de l’inusité. Passant en revue les versions magique, prophétique, théologique, morale, pathologique et analytique de la folie, l'auteur conclut son propos en attirant l'attention sur la nécessité de prendre toujours en compte cet ancrage culturel qui caractérise autant le discours fou que le discours sur la folie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".