Bifacial microcrystalline silicon solar cells with improved performance due to μc-SiO<sub><i>x</i></sub>:H doped layers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present the development and application of n-type hydrogenated microcrystalline silicon oxide (μc-SiOx:H) in semitransparent bifacial microcrystalline silicon (μc-Si:H) solar cells. Semitransparent bifacial solar cells are of interest for a number of technical applications like building integration or concentrator devices, but also can offer new insight into solar cell properties due to the possibility to illuminate the cell from both sides. Appropriately selected μc-SiOx:H n-layers with low refractive index and high optical band gap allow the reduction of the reflection of the cells and improve short circuit current density (JSC) and conversion efficiencies. The quality of n-type μc-SiOx:H window layers is demonstrated in solar cells with highly reflective ZnO/Ag contacts. High JSC values of 24.8 mA/cm2 and efficiencies of 9.5% are obtained for 1 μm thick solar cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".