Tactiques de communication et retombées médiatiques de la manifestation «Colère générale contre le gouvernement libéral»
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose l'analyse d'une tactique de communication d'un groupe militant ayant organise une manifestation dans le but de perturber le congres d'un parti politique. Ce recours a des tactiques « musclees » ou de perturbation de la part de groupes militants sera analyse d'abord sous son angle historique en rappelant quelques etudes realisees a propos des conditions de succes de telles methodes et des dangers potentiels qu'elles presentent pour les groupes y ayant recours. Nous verrons ensuite comment s'est developpee la tactique du groupe militant et quelles retombees mediatiques elle a generees. Using qualitative and quantitative analysis, this article tries to assess the outcomes of a public interest group demonstration organized with the goal of disrupting a political party congress. A historical perspective will be presented in the light of studies examining the conditions of success of such tactics and the potential dangers they might pose to groups that use them. We will then evaluate the impact this demonstration has had in the media by assessing the number of articles written on the subject and the journalists’ angles on this story.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it