MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1804248122 · doi:10.7202/019877ar

La génération X au Québec : une génération sacrifiée ?

2009· article· fr· W1804248122 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Charles Fleury

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches sociographiques · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article examine de manière comparative le parcours professionnel de diverses générations québécoises à partir des données transversales recueillies par Statistique Canada depuis 1976. Il cherche plus spécifiquement à savoir jusqu’à quel point la génération X constitue une génération sacrifiée, comme l’ont laissé entendre nombre d’observateurs au cours des années 1980 et 1990. L’analyse montre que, si toutes les générations ont été touchées d’une manière ou d’une autre par les mutations économiques des dernières décennies, la génération X semble avoir, plus que toute autre cohorte, cumulé de multiples désavantages sur le marché du travail. Non seulement a-t-elle connu d’importantes difficultés d’insertion professionnelle, mais elle a aussi été la pionnière d’un nouveau modèle de travail ainsi que d’un nouveau cycle de vie professionnelle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.475
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches sociographiquesSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207