MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1804469307 · doi:10.1542/peds.2005-0698oo

Is Obesity Associated With Asthma in Young Children?

2005· article· en· W1804469307 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John S James

Bibliographic record

VenuePEDIATRICS · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsthmaBody mass indexObesityOdds ratioConfidence intervalPediatricsDemographyPopulationChildhood obesityPercentileNational Health and Nutrition Examination SurveyLogistic regressionRisk factorOverweightEnvironmental healthInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To T, Vydykhan TN, Dell S, Tassoudji M, Harris JK. J Pediatr. 2004;144:162–168The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between obesity and asthma.A population-based sample of Canadian schoolchildren.Baseline data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth were used in this cross-sectional study. The investigators included 11 199 children aged 4 to 11 years whose biological mothers reported data on asthma, height, and weight. Body mass index was categorized, and obesity was defined as a body mass index in the ≥85th percentile. Children with asthma had parents who reported the diagnosis, and they took prescribed inhalants, had wheezing or an attack in the previous year, or had their activities limited by asthma. Multiple logistic regression was used.The prevalence of asthma was 9.9%. Maternal history of asthma was a risk factor for asthma among all children. Single-child status and maternal depression were risk factors for girls. The odds ratio for asthma, comparing highest and lowest body-mass-index categories, was 1.02 (99% confidence interval: 0.70, 1.46) for boys and 1.06 (99% confidence interval: 0.67, 1.69) for girls.This study suggests that there is no statistical association between obesity and asthma among 4- to 11-year-old Canadian children.This article addresses a highly contentious issue, focusing on the possible association between obesity and asthma, which has been investigated in both pediatric and adult populations. Both asthma and obesity are common chronic conditions, and in recent years, the prevalence of both of these conditions has increased in North America. Although a number of published studies have documented a positive association between obesity and asthma prevalence and incidence in adults, results from pediatric studies have not been consistent. There has been no clear explanation or consensus for this discrepancy. In this investigation, To and colleagues did not find a significant statistical association between obesity and asthma, but they did find that the single-most important risk factor for asthma was a maternal history of asthma, which has been a common, consistent finding in other pediatric asthma studies. Additional studies in pediatric populations addressing this issue will likely continue and hopefully will help to resolve whether there is a real association between obesity and asthma in children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.441
Threshold uncertainty score0.877

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePEDIATRICS→Same topicAsthma and respiratory diseases→French-language works237,207→