Études françaises et mondialisation : éléments pour un état des lieux
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En vue de problématiser la « crise » du français et des « Études françaises » en Europe et dans le monde, cet article se propose d’analyser la place du français dans une configuration mondiale des langues, au regard des continuités et des discontinuités historiques et géopolitiques des espaces désignés comme « français » ou comme « francophones ».
 Les modèles théoriques et des lieux critiques convoqués s’articuleront à une approche diachronique par la mise en perspective des scansions emblématiques du processus de « mise en récit » de la France comme modèle culturel, telles qu’elles peuvent être mobilisées dans les débats sur l’actuelle « crise du français » dans sa dimension internationale. 
 La relativisation aussi bien l’universalité que du déclin de la langue et de la culture françaises, me servira à mettre en évidence les prémisses sur lesquelles pourraient reposer un élargissement de la littérature française aux littératures francophones ou mondiales et à faire émerger des voies dans lesquelles je considère que la discipline et ses enseignements pourraient s’engager.
 
 Abstract
 In order to problematize the “crisis” of French, and “French studies” in Europe and in the world, this article analyzes the situation of French within a configuration of world languages, in light of the historic and geopolitical continuities and discontinuities of the realms characterized as “French” or “francophone”. The theoretical models and the critical premises adopted will be combined with a diachronic approach in order to highlight emblematic scansions belonging to the “narrative” process that makes France a cultural model, as they may be addressed in debates on the current” French crisis” from an international perspective. Relativization, universality as well as the decline of the French language and culture will highlight the premises on which the broadening of French literature to francophone or world literatures could be based and enable the emergence of paths the discipline and its teaching could take.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".