La gestion des ressources humaines et le problème de l’encastrement de l’entreprise en Afrique : l’exemple d’une mine au Ghana
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À rebours de l’approche normative courante, cet article propose une analyse micro-politique institutionnelle pour discuter des enjeux socioculturels de la GRH à l’épreuve du contexte africain. La contestation de la stratégie managériale fait ressortir deux modèles de GRH dans une mine au Ghana, filiale d’une multinationale nordaméricaine. Façonné par les politiques de restructuration, le premier modèle est orienté vers la RSE et s’oppose au second plutôt focalisé sur les rapports collectifs d’emploi. Mais allant au-delà de l’opposition entre les travailleurs et la communauté qui segmente les pratiques de GRH, l’article recourt aux mécanismes institutionnels pour expliquer comment les acteurs locaux négocient à leur convenance l’encastrement de l’entreprise dans leur contexte.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".