MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1805552042

Petrography and Petrogenesis of the Neshveh Intrusive Rocks, Northeast Saveh, Central Iran

2013· article· en· W1805552042 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Amin Panahi, Reza Keshavarzi, Masood kiani, Mansor Taheri, Bahman Javadian

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of academic and applied studies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetrogenesisGeochemistryGeologyHornblendePlagioclasePetrographyBiotiteMagmaFeldsparPetrologyQuartzBasaltVolcano
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Neshveh intrusive mass is located in the Northeast of Saveh and is considered as a part of the Urumieh-Dokhtar magmatic arc (UDMC). The mass is replaced in the Eocene-Oligocene volcanosedimentary rocks consist mainly of quartz monzodiorite, granodiorite and granite. Based on the Field studies, petrographical and geochemical evidences, the Neshveh rocks have derived from a K-rich, metaluminous calc-alkline magma. P2O5 versus SiO2 has a decreasing trend that is a sign of I-type rocks. Due to entrance into the structure of minerals like: Fe-Ti oxides, plagioclase and hornblende, MgO, Fe2O3, MnO, Al2O3 and TiO2decrease with increasing SiO2. On the other hand Rb and Ba increasing trend demonstrate no fractionation of biotite and K-feldspar during the magma evolution. Y decreasing trend results from fractionation of hornblende. REE patterns of the studied rocks normalized by Chondrite, follow same trend representing their unity source and the role of the fractionation in the magma evolution. Low amounts of some elements such as; V, Co, Cr, Ni, Mg# in Neshveh intrusive rocks reveal their formation from an evolved magma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of academic and applied studiesSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207