MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1805716770 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2001.933749

Stability issues in digital circuits in amorphous silicon technology

2002· article· en· W1805716770 on OpenAlexaff
N. Mohan, K. S. Karim, S. Prakash, Arokia Nathan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThin-Film Transistor Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThin-film transistorMultiplexerMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsElectronic circuitLiquid-crystal displayTransistorAmorphous siliconBiasingThreshold voltageLogic gateAmorphous solidDigital electronicsSiliconElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringVoltageMultiplexingNanotechnologyCrystalline siliconEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrogenated amorphous silicon thin film transistors (a-Si:H TFTs) are attractive for flat-panel liquid crystal displays (LCDs) and imaging sensor arrays in view of their large area capability. In large area imaging arrays or displays, the need for multiplexer circuits arises because of the large number of external gate and data line connections. This work presents a multiplexer (MUX) design using pass transistor logic (PTL) with a-Si:H TFTs used as switches. This research investigates inherent a-Si:H TFT switch metastability issues such as threshold voltage shifts due to prolonged TFT gate bias. In a typical MUX application, most of the TFTs are stressed under pulse bias instead of constant bias. Differences in stability behavior are observed under pulse and constant bias stress in a-Si:H TFTs. In this paper, we present constant and pulse bias stress measurement data performed on in-house fabricated a-Si:H TFTs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.557
Threshold uncertainty score0.673

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicThin-Film Transistor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207