MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W180654263 · doi:10.1096/fasebj.21.5.a276-c

The Mn‐binding site and newly identified C‐terminal metal binding site both play important roles in the thermal stability of Mn‐peroxidase.

2007· article· en· W180654263 on OpenAlexaff
Heather Youngs, Grant Mauk

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicChromium effects and bioremediation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryPeroxidaseBinding siteManganeseActive siteThermal stabilityHemeA-siteMetalManganese peroxidaseBiochemistryBiophysicsEnzymeBiologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extracellular fungal peroxidases such manganese peroxidase (MnP) offer potential in biomass utilization, biomaterial manufacture and detoxification of recalcitrant pollutants. Use of these enzymes in industrial processing requires a detailed understanding of their thermal tolerance limits. Although the role of calcium in protecting MnP from thermal inactivation has been studied extensively, the roles of the Mn‐binding site and C‐terminus in the thermal stability of MnP remain unexplored. In this work, we examine the effects of exogenous metals on the residual activities, heme Soret absorptions, and secondary structures of MnP. Analysis of the wild‐type MnP indicates that, at low pH, addition of exogenous Mn2+ stabilizes the protein to a greater extent than Ca2+. Analyses of the Mn‐binding site variants, D179N and E39D, indicate that the stabilization is due to interactions at the Mn‐binding site. A new variant, D84N, at the newly identified C‐terminal metal binding site is also examined. The data indicate that this secondary site also contributes to thermal stability, although to a lesser extent than mutations at the Mn‐binding or Ca‐binding sites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicChromium effects and bioremediationFrench-language works237,207