MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1806558838 · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.169.11.6261

CD4 Dimers Constitute the Functional Component Required for T Cell Activation

2002· article· en· W1806558838 on OpenAlexafffund
Maria-Cristina Moldovan, Abdelkader Yachou, Karine Lévesque, Hao Wu, Wayne A. Hendrickson, Éric A. Cohen, Rafick‐Pierre Sékaly

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicT-cell and B-cell Immunology
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalMcGill UniversityUniversité de MontréalMontreal Clinical Research Institute
FundersNational Cancer InstituteCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsDimerT cellTransfectionMutationChemistryExtracellularCell biologyFunction (biology)MutantPoint mutationReceptorBiologyBiophysicsBiochemistryGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The CD4 molecule plays a key role in the development and activation of helper T cells. Dimerization and oligomerization is often a necessary step in the function of several cell surface receptors. Herein, we provide direct biochemical evidence confirming the presence of CD4 as dimers in transfected cells from hemopoetic and fibroblastic origin as well as in primary T cells. Such dimers are also observed with murine CD4 confirming selective pressure during evolution to maintain such a structure. Using a series of point mutations, we have precisely mapped the dimerization site at residues K318 and Q344 within the fourth extracellular domain of CD4. These residues are highly conserved and their mutation results in interference with dimer formation. More importantly, we demonstrate that dimer formation is essential for the coligand and coreceptor functions of CD4 in T cell activation. These data strongly suggest that CD4 dimerization is necessary for helper T cell function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyFrench-language works237,207