MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W180656547

Investigation of influence of sliding of rolls over plate on continuous bending with noncompatible conical rolls

2007· article· en· W180656547 on OpenAlex
Zhengkun Feng, Henri Champliaud, Jun Zeng, Thiên-My Dao

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venueinternational conference on Modelling and simulation · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgy and Material Forming
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConical surfaceBendingFinite element methodMaterials scienceStructural engineeringMechanical engineeringEngineeringComposite material
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conical roll bending with compatible conical rolls ensures no-sliding between the rolls and the plate section and high bending quality. However, the process is so expensive that the rolls must be changed when the radii of the desired cone change. For noncompatible conical rolls, the necessary speed ratio between the top and bottom of the plate sections is provided by an attachment at the top side of the section, where the rolls slide over the plate. This paper will present the investigations of the influence of the sliding on the bending quality. Numerical simulations based on finite element method are performed with commercial software ANSYS LS-DYNA. The results agree well with those obtained with compatible conical rolls.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it