Bibliographic record
Abstract
Numros spciaux portant sur des sujets rgionaux Comme vous savez, l'acoustique donne matire plusieurs sujets d'ordre gnral et crer des centaines d'emplois au pays, et ce, dans diffrents secteurs tels que l'ducation, la recherche, la consultation professionnelle et autres.Afin de bien reflter cette diversit et peut-tre mme faire connatre davantage les professionnels de notre voisinage qui oeuvrent dans le domaine, l'Acoustique canadienne fait un appel soumettre une srie d'articles provenant de personnes, groupes ou compagnies qui font partie d'une mme grande rgion du Canada.Pour le moment, la programmation provisoire des numros spciaux rgionaux de l'Acoustique canadienne va comme suit: juin 2015 (Montral), juin 2016 (Toronto), et juin 2017 (Halifax).D'autres dates et villes seront ajoutes au fil du temps.Une telle offre ne se reproduira pas avec 7 ou 9 ans, assurez-vous d'en profiter maintenant!Appel communications
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".