MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1807225532

Flux Sites Revisited: New Insights From a 3D-LiDAR Survey

2009· article· en· W1807225532 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Natascha Kljun, L. Chasmer, C. Hopkinson, Alan Barr, T. A. Black, J. H. McCaughey

Bibliographic record

VenueCronfa (Swansea University) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueen (butterfly)GeographyLibrary scienceArchaeologyRegional sciencePhysical geographyMeteorology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

(1) Swansea University, Geography, Swansea, United Kingdom (n.kljun@swansea.ac.uk), (2) Cold Regions Research Centre, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada, (3) Applied Geomatics Research Group, Lawrencetown, NS, Canada, (4) Climate Research Branch, Meteorological Service of Canada, Saskatoon, SK, Canada , (5) Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, (6) Department of Geography, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.316
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCronfa (Swansea University)Same topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207