Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Afin de qualifier la théologie trinitaire comme une théologie de pèlerins, on doit s’interroger sur le rapport entre l’exercice de la théologie trinitaire et la béatitude eschatologique. Mais il convient d’abord de clarifier la corrélation objective entre la béatitude divine et le mystère trinitaire. Se pose alors la question suivante : comment interpréter, dans la Somme de théologie, l’enchaînement inaperçu entre la dernière question du traité sur l’essence de Dieu, consacrée à la béatitude divine, et la première question sur la Trinité, consacrée aux deux processions trinitaires ? Afin de négocier au mieux ce délicat passage, il faut analyser le différend épistémologique entre Thomas d’Aquin et Richard de Saint-Victor à propos du statut des « raisons » en théologie trinitaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".