Multi-Objective Optimization for Power Efficient Full-Duplex Wireless Communication Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate power efficient resource allocation algorithm design for multiuser wireless communication systems employing a full-duplex (FD) radio base station for serving multiple half-duplex (HD) downlink and uplink users simultaneously. We propose a multi-objective optimization framework for achieving two conflicting yet desirable system design objectives, i.e., total downlink transmit power minimization and total uplink transmit power minimization, while guaranteeing the quality-of-service of all users. To this end, the weighted Tchebycheff method is adopted to formulate a multi-objective optimization problem (MOOP). Although the considered MOOP is non-convex, we solve it optimally by semidefinite programming relaxation. Simulation results not only unveil the trade-off between the total downlink and the total uplink transmit power, but also confirm that the proposed FD system provides substantial power savings over traditional HD systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it