MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1807952157 · doi:10.3917/cips.106.0167

Étude exploratoire de facteurs psychologiques et professionnels associés à un environnement organisationnel concerné par des suicides dans le secteur tertiaire

2015· article· fr· W1807952157 on OpenAlex
Caroline Nicolas, Monique Séguin, Pascale Desrumaux, Lucy Baugnet

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLes cahiers internationaux de psychologie sociale · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en OutaouaisDouglas Mental Health University InstituteUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesConciliationPsychologyArtLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Concernant certains suicides, nous nous interrogeons sur le fait que la santé mentale de la personne suicidée ait pu être impactée par certains facteurs professionnels. L’objectif était d’explorer l’environnement organisationnel des collègues de salariés suicidés. Une recherche exploratoire par entretiens a été conduite en France en 2012 auprès de 23 salariés d’une entreprise des services. Deux salariés étaient récemment décédés par suicide, avec suspicion d’un lien professionnel. Selon les discours, analysés avec le logiciel ALCESTE, des réorganisations successives agissent sur la pénibilité (charge de travail, heures supplémentaires, évolutions internes), le climat (conflits, comportements antisociaux, placardisations) et le bien-être (conciliation travail et famille, démotivation, insatisfaction, solitude).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it