MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1808024690 · doi:10.3968/7066

Study on Strategies and Mechanisms of Strengthening the Education of Chinese Dream Among University Students

2015· article· en· W1808024690 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Changsong Li

Bibliographic record

VenueHigher education of social science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Technology and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDreamChinese DreamNormalization (sociology)Task (project management)Higher educationPsychologyMathematics educationContent (measure theory)PedagogySociologyPolitical scienceManagementSocial scienceMathematicsLawPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nowadays, strengthening the education of Chinese Dream among university students is an important task for educators engaged in higher education. The work of promoting Chinese Dream into teaching material, into classroom and into students’ mind serves as a crucial strategy for the education of Chinese Dream among university students. Because of the integration in terms of theory and practice, educators and education, it realizes a remarkable effect. In addition, the exploration of a long-term for Chinese Dream and its scientification and normalization is an important strategy for the education of Chinese Dream as well. This paper demonstrates this content theoretically.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.851
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHigher education of social scienceSame topicEducational Technology and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207