MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1808043210

Non-invasive Fetal Sex Determination using Nested PCR of Free Fetal DNA in Maternal Plasma

2014· article· en· W1808043210 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Saeed Shirali, Alireza Mesbah-Namin, Hamidreza Zahiri, Elaheh Khodadi, S.M. Mirtorabi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of academic and applied studies · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmelogeninFetusDNA extractionBiologyPrimer (cosmetics)Cell-free fetal DNAAndrologyObstetricsMedicinePolymerase chain reactionGeneGeneticsPrenatal diagnosisPregnancyChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1 Department of Laboratory Sciences, School of Paramedical Sciences, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran. 2 Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. 3 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran. 4 Department of reproductive techniques, Centre for Breeding and Improvement of Animal Production, Karaj, Iran. Abstract Cattle breeding are one of the fundamental and important economic activities. Sex determination is important for the management of fetal sex that which gender is more favorable according to the different targets. Methods of sex determination are divided into two categories: invasive and non-invasive. There are variants of candidate genes for prenatal diagnosis of fetal sex. Amelogenin genes that are on both chromosomes X and Y are significantly considered for fetal sex determination. Analysis of free fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum as anon-invasive method to gender determination is an active background for research. In this study the proliferation of free fetal DNA of Amelogenin gene in maternal blood and bovine morula embryos by using PCR for fetal sex determination were investigated. 51 blood samples from pregnant cows and also 18 samples of 5-6 days morula were collected from ranching and Centre of Breeding in Karaj. Serum preparation and extraction of DNA for each sample was done using modified phenol-chloroform extraction procedure. This primer was selected to allow the amplification of a 467 bp single fragment of the X chromosomes in female cattle and two 467 and 341 bp fragments of the X and Y chromosomes in male cattle To evaluate the agreement between predictions obtained and results of Follow up, chi-square and coefficients of Cohen's kappa and phi were used. This method could detect accurately the sex of male and females embryos by 89%.According to the results of chi-square test, there was an significant agreement (P <0.05) between the results predicted by the PCR and the results obtained from Follow up. For the value of agreement, the criterion (P <0.05) has been shown a significant agreement between the results predicted by the PCR and the results obtained from Follow up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score0.371

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of academic and applied studiesSame topicPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207