MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1808513342 · doi:10.21696/rcsl072014590

La guerra contra las drogas en México, la política exterior canadiense y los derechos humanos

2014· article· es· W1808513342 on OpenAlex
Hepzibah Muñoz Martínez, Leslie Ann Jeffrey

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de El Colegio de San Luis · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Violence, Rights in Latin America
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceDemocracyHuman rightsPhilosophyLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En la actualidad, la política exterior de Canadá hacia México se enfoca principalmente en el comercio, la inversión y la seguridad, mientras que los derechos humanos tienen escasa visibilidad en la agenda bilateral. El presente artículo argumenta que esta escasa visibilidad se debe a tres razones. Primera, la concepción limitada de democracia electoral del gobierno canadiense evita que este último considere discutir los abusos de derechos humanos en su agenda con México porque es considerado una democracia. Segundo, un enfoque de derechos humanos hacia México podría afectar la actual estrategia gubernamental canadiense de comercio e inversión, particularmente en el sector minero, respecto de su país vecino del sur. Tercera, la subordinación de los asuntos de derechos humanos en México a la agenda bilateral de seguridad coincide con la estrategia doméstica de seguridad canadiense.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it