La guerra contra las drogas en México, la política exterior canadiense y los derechos humanos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En la actualidad, la política exterior de Canadá hacia México se enfoca principalmente en el comercio, la inversión y la seguridad, mientras que los derechos humanos tienen escasa visibilidad en la agenda bilateral. El presente artículo argumenta que esta escasa visibilidad se debe a tres razones. Primera, la concepción limitada de democracia electoral del gobierno canadiense evita que este último considere discutir los abusos de derechos humanos en su agenda con México porque es considerado una democracia. Segundo, un enfoque de derechos humanos hacia México podría afectar la actual estrategia gubernamental canadiense de comercio e inversión, particularmente en el sector minero, respecto de su país vecino del sur. Tercera, la subordinación de los asuntos de derechos humanos en México a la agenda bilateral de seguridad coincide con la estrategia doméstica de seguridad canadiense.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".