Laparoscopic removal of a pelvic cyst associated with obstructedmegaureter and dysplastic renal remnant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report a case of a 41-year-old man with a solitary functioningleft kidney and history of chronic pelvic discomfort associatedwith lower urinary tract symptoms. Imaging revealed a largecystic structure in the pelvis attached to a dilated tortuous ureteron the right with congenital absence of the right kidney. The patientunderwent laparoscopic removal of the pelvic cyst and dilatedright ureter. Pathological assessment revealed mesonephric remnantsrepresenting dysplastic renal tissue attached to a dilated andobstructed megaureter, extending into the bladder wall and forminga large pelvic cyst. The patient’s symptoms resolved. A laparoscopicapproach represents an excellent surgical option for pelvicpathology.Nous décrivons le cas d’un homme de 41 ans porteur d’un seulrein fonctionnel (gauche) et ayant des antécédents de douleurspelviennes chroniques liées à des symptômes affectant les voiesurinaires inférieures. Les épreuves d’imagerie ont révélé une massekystique volumineuse au niveau du pelvis, une dilatation et unesinuosité urétérales du côté droit et l’absence congénitale derein droit. Le patient a subi une ablation par laparoscopie du kystepelvien et de la section dilatée de l’uretère droit. L’évaluationpathologique a révélé des vestiges mésonéphriques constituésde tissu rénal dysplasique lié à un méga-uretère obstrué avec dilatationkystique se prolongeant dans la paroi vésicale et formant ainsiun kyste pelvien volumineux. Les symptômes du patient ont disparu.Une approche laparoscopique représente une excellenteoption chirurgicale en présence de pathologie pelvienne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".