MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Éducation aux médias et problématiques interculturelles. Question de méthodes

2012· article· fr· W1809049850 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueQuestions de communication · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducator Training and Historical Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les médias posent de sérieuses questions interculturelles. Pour les comprendre, nous avons mené une recherche, dans le cadre d’une thèse en cotutelle, portant sur la convergence de deux formes de communication, médiatique et interculturelle, au sein des discours institutionnels sur l’éducation aux médias de l’Australie, du Québec et de la France. Les méthodes, multiples, construites en miroir d’une problématique évolutive, se sont avérées pertinentes pour répondre aux différents niveaux de connaissance sollicités, autant dans l’approche internationale et la posture comparatiste, que par l’étude de cas et dans l’usage des outils de l’analyse de discours. Cette contribution en présente les principales étapes méthodologiques ainsi que la cohérence générale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.294
GPT teacher head0.506
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it