MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1809364733 · doi:10.1002/0471142956.cy0927s46

Whole Blood Processing for Measurement of Signaling Proteins by Flow Cytometry

2008· article· en· W1809364733 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Protocols in Cytometry · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlow cytometrySignal transductionCell biologyPhosphorylationBiologyHaematopoiesisPhenotypeImmune systemSignaling proteinsCytometryComputational biologyImmunologyStem cellGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Signal transduction pathways link external stimuli with cellular responses, which normally regulate cell proliferation, death, and differentiation. The study of signal transduction was revolutionized through the development of phospho-specific antibodies that recognize proteins only when they are phosphorylated at specific sites. As discussed by Nolan and co-workers (UNIT ), one of the unique features of flow cytometry is its ability to perform correlated measurements of multiple phosphorylation states at the single cell level. This provides insight into the complexity of signaling networks that is not obtained by standard biochemical techniques. Furthermore, in combination with other phenotypic markers, flow cytometry can measure alterations in signaling pathways in subpopulations of cells. This clearly has wide potential for studying disorders of the hematopoietic and immune systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.364
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it