MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1809458414 · doi:10.3968/6973

Heilongjiang Petroleum & Petrochemical Service Outsourcing Industry Cluster Construction

2015· article· en· W1809458414 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiaochun Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in petroleum exploration and development · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Computational Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetrochemicalOutsourcingService (business)Petroleum industryPetroleumDownstream (manufacturing)BusinessUpstream (networking)Knowledge process outsourcingIndustrial organizationEngineeringBusiness clusterMarketingWaste managementChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heilongjiang petroleum & petrochemical service outsourcing business covers whole industry chain of upstream, midstream and downstream of petroleum & petrochemical field, and owns technology, software and hardware support system. Petroleum & petrochemical service outsourcing enterprises and related organizations own the conditions of forming petroleum & petrochemical industry cluster, and the construction of petroleum & petrochemical service outsourcing industry cluster has certain necessity and feasibility. The construction goal is “One Base and Two Centers”. The construction measures include the introduction of well-known enterprises, the support to backbone enterprises as well as cultivation and introduction of talents, doing well training work, constructing platform facilities, integrating outsourcing market, strengthening organizational leadership and perfecting policy system, and so forth. Key words: Petroleum & petrochemical; Service outsourcing industry; Industry cluster

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.098

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in petroleum exploration and developmentSame topicAdvanced Computational Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207