MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1810477986 · doi:10.4000/chrhc.4592

Les empires djihadistes de l’Ouest africain aux xviiie-xixe siècles

2015· article· fr· W1810477986 on OpenAlexaff
Paul E. Lovejoy

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers d’histoire Revue d’histoire critique · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicColonialism, slavery, and trade
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le retour de l’appel au djihad dans le monde contemporain conduit à un intérêt nouveau pour les grands empires qui ont été construits en Afrique dans le cadre de mouvements djihadistes au xviiie et au xixe siècles. Ces offensives militaires se sont appuyées sur des traditions religieuses plus anciennes, la justification des djihads s’enracinant dans la vie du Prophète et de ses successeurs. Les dirigeants politiques qui lancent ces conquêtes mettent en avant la dimension religieuse, mais Paul Lovejoy montre que la dimension ethnique (la domination peule) est également forte, ainsi que la dimension économique, la puissance de ces empires étant fondée sur le commerce et l’utilisation des esclaves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.786
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.017
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers d’histoire Revue d’histoire critiqueSame topicColonialism, slavery, and tradeFrench-language works237,207