Changing Community Perceptions of Sustainable Rural Development in Scotland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The growing popularity of community land trusts as a mechanism for greater community participation in the control of local improvement is a particularly significant aspect of sustainable rural development in the Highlands and Islands of Scotland. Combining purposive selective interviews with members of a local Land Trust, observations at public meetings, and a review of recent literature on the development of the region, a case study of the Galson Estate Trust, Isle of Lewis, Scotland, is presented. Community ownership of land is seen as being instrumental in the shift in perceptions from short-term, marginal, externally-dependent activities towards solutions that are long-term (as indicated by schemes for renewable energy generation and environmental enhancement), core identity (seen as greater community confidence and enhanced local democracy) and locally driven developmental priorities (supported by revenue income streams). The process of local empowerment accompanying this shift in perceptions is regarded as having substantial benefits for social capital and skills acquisition at the community level. Early results from Trust activities indicate that ownership of the land, together with the capacity-building process of community participation in its management, has encouraged growth in a sense of local empowerment, together with providing employment, confidence, and other social improvements. Keywords: Community, land, rural, sustainability, localism, crofting, energy ----------------------------------------------------- Résumé La popularité croissante de la fiducie foncière communautaire, comme mécanisme visant à faire participer davantage la communauté au contrôle des améliorations locales, est un aspect particulièrement significatif du développement durable des Hauts plateaux (Highlands) et des îles d'Écosse. En combinant une sélection d'entrevues ciblées avec les membres de la fiducie foncière locale, les observations durant les réunions publiques ainsi que les études de la littérature récente sur le développement de la région, une étude de cas est présentée sur le patrimoine fiduciaire Galson, dans l'île de Lewis, en Écosse. La propriété collective des terres est vue comme un remède aux variations et aux activités externes et marginales à court-terme, dont les habitants dépendent. Ils recherchent des solutions à long-terme (tel qu'indiqué sur les projets pour la production d'énergie renouvelable et l'amélioration de l'environnement), une identité fondamentale (vue comme une plus grande confiance communautaire et une amélioration de la démocratie locale) et des priorités de développement orientées localement (qui s'appuient sur les sources de revenus). Le processus d'autonomisation local accompagnant ce changement de perceptions est perçu comme ayant des bénéfices substantiels pour le capital social et l'acquisition de compétences au niveau de la communauté. Des premiers résultats d'activités de fiducie indiquent que la propriété terrestre, associée au processus de renforcement des capacités de participation communautaire à la gestion, a encouragé la croissance d'un sentiment accru d'autonomie locale, tout en développant la création d'emplois, la confiance et d'autres améliorations sociales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".