GLOBALIZAÇÃO, NOVAS REGIÕES DE PRODUÇÃO AGRÍCOLA E DESIGUALDADES SOCIAIS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este trabalho objetiva compreender uma das dimensões da relação entre globalização e agricultura, através da análise de processos sociais que surgem dos novos vínculos entre produção e circulação de alimentos frescos no mercado mundial, tendo como estudo de caso uma região de produção frutícola, localizada no Vale do São Francisco do Nordeste do Brasil. Neste sentido, tenta compreender como as transformações no consumo e nas condições de controle dos mercados interferem nas estruturas da produção agrícola de regiões particulares, com impactos sobre as formas de acesso aos meios de produção e de controle sobre o trabalho, reproduzindo novos padrões de desigualdades sociais. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: globalizaão; agricultura; trabalho agrícola; fruticultura; regionaliozação; diferenciação social. Globalization, new regions for agricultural productions and social unevenness This paper tries to explain one of the dimensions of the relationship between globalization and agriculture, through the analysis of the social processes arising from the new ties between production and the circulation of fresh food in the international market. The case study is a fruit-growing region in the valley of the São Francisco River, in the northeast of Brazil. In this sense, it tries to explain how the transformations on the consumption and on the control of the market conditions interfere in the agricultural production structures of the specific regions, having impacts on the ways of access to the means of production and the work control, reproducing new patterns of social unevenness. KEY WORDS: globalization; agriculture; agriculture work; fruit growing; specific regions; social difference. Publicação Online do Caderno CRH: http://www.cadernocrh.ufba.br
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it