Migration de prothèse herniaire en intravésical : mécanisme et enjeux
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La migration d’une prothèse synthétique pour hernie abdominale ou inguinale est un incident rare. Elle peut survenir aussi bien en intrapéritonéal qu’en sous-péritonéal. La migration intrapéritonéale entraîne un risque d’obstruction intestinale et d’infection pouvant menacer le pronostic vital. La migration endovésicale est beaucoup plus rare. La plaque en endovésical se comporte comme un corps étranger avec risque de calcification et de cystite. Le diagnostic différentiel se pose surtout avec un calcul vésical ou une tumeur de la vessie. Devant la prédominance de signes irritatifs non spécifiques, le diagnostic repose sur les observations radiologiques mais surtout cystoscopiques. Le traitement est essentiellement endoscopique, par la résection de l’extrémité prolabée en endovésical.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".