MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1812222394 · doi:10.15353/pced.v7i0.40

Economics and the end of the nation-state

2014· article· en· W1812222394 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePapers in Canadian Economic Development · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal History, Politics, and Ideology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipSustainable developmentEquity (law)OfficerWork (physics)State (computer science)Economic growthBusinessPolitical scienceQuality (philosophy)Public administrationPublic relationsEconomicsEngineeringFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Agencies involved in economic development recognize the need to take a more sustainable approach in their work. Economic Development Officers (EDOs) can play a significant role in ensuring there are processes in place within their organization to promote sustainable development. This paper provides a brief background on this subject and highlights local and regional policies to assist the EDO in developing programs designed to foster sustainable development at the local and regional levels. The author argues that EDOs with an inherent understanding of the principles of quality of life; fairness and equity; participation and partnership; care for the natural environment; and thought for the future are best positioned to effect change. However, the degree of change will largely depend on the commitment and support of the community or the region.Keywords: sustainable development, Economic Development Officer (EDO), policy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it