MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1812707436 · doi:10.14288/acme.v14i1.1139

El espacio público y la pugna por el significado de la Democracia. El debate alternativo sobre el Estado de la Nación en el movimiento 15-M

2015· article· es· W1812707436 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American Urban Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPublic spacePolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Desde el pasado 15 de mayo de 2011, las calles y plazas españolas han experimentado una transformación sustancial. La irrupción en escena de un movimiento social caracterizado por las enormes asambleas ciudadanas celebradas en las más importantes plazas de cada ciudad y las numerosas manifestaciones no violentas, han operado un cambio de raíz en el espacio público otrora caracterizado por los rasgos habituales de la producción neoliberal del espacio urbano. La protesta española presenta tres características centrales que la vinculan y la diferencian del resto de fenómenos similares que está viviendo parte de Europa y el norte de África: la pugna por la reconstrucción del significado de la democracia contemporánea, el rechazo al modelo de políticas de ajuste para salir de la crisis y, más en general, de las políticas neoliberales y, por último, la plasmación de ambas en formas de relación y reapropiación del espacio urbano desconocidas o enormemente minoritarias hasta el estallido del movimiento. Así, este artículo pretende presentar algunos rasgos del discurso, los repertorios de acción colectiva y la relación con el espacio urbano del 15-M a través del ejemplo del «Debate popular sobre el estado de la Nación». Since last May, 15 2011 the squares and streets of Spanish cities have undergone substantial changes. The emergence of a social movement defined by the celebration of massive civic assemblies in the main squares of every city and the manifold non-violent demonstrations has allowed drastic changes in public space –previously traversed by the common features attached to the neoliberal production of urban space. The Spanish protests deploy three main characteristics that link and differentiate it from similar phenomena taking place in part of Europe and North Africa: the struggle for the re-building of the meaning of contemporary democracy, the rejection of the model of adjustment policies to get out of the crisis and, broadly speaking, neoliberal policies and, lastly, the projection of these two previous processes onto forms of relation and re-appropriation of urban space unknown or highly narrow until the surfacing of the movement. Thus, this article is set out to explore the 15-M Movement in relation to some of its discursive features, its collective action repertoires and its relation with urban space through the example of the «Popular debate on the state of the Nation».

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.746
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it