El espacio público y la pugna por el significado de la Democracia. El debate alternativo sobre el Estado de la Nación en el movimiento 15-M
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Desde el pasado 15 de mayo de 2011, las calles y plazas españolas han experimentado una transformación sustancial. La irrupción en escena de un movimiento social caracterizado por las enormes asambleas ciudadanas celebradas en las más importantes plazas de cada ciudad y las numerosas manifestaciones no violentas, han operado un cambio de raíz en el espacio público otrora caracterizado por los rasgos habituales de la producción neoliberal del espacio urbano. La protesta española presenta tres características centrales que la vinculan y la diferencian del resto de fenómenos similares que está viviendo parte de Europa y el norte de África: la pugna por la reconstrucción del significado de la democracia contemporánea, el rechazo al modelo de políticas de ajuste para salir de la crisis y, más en general, de las políticas neoliberales y, por último, la plasmación de ambas en formas de relación y reapropiación del espacio urbano desconocidas o enormemente minoritarias hasta el estallido del movimiento. Así, este artículo pretende presentar algunos rasgos del discurso, los repertorios de acción colectiva y la relación con el espacio urbano del 15-M a través del ejemplo del «Debate popular sobre el estado de la Nación». Since last May, 15 2011 the squares and streets of Spanish cities have undergone substantial changes. The emergence of a social movement defined by the celebration of massive civic assemblies in the main squares of every city and the manifold non-violent demonstrations has allowed drastic changes in public space –previously traversed by the common features attached to the neoliberal production of urban space. The Spanish protests deploy three main characteristics that link and differentiate it from similar phenomena taking place in part of Europe and North Africa: the struggle for the re-building of the meaning of contemporary democracy, the rejection of the model of adjustment policies to get out of the crisis and, broadly speaking, neoliberal policies and, lastly, the projection of these two previous processes onto forms of relation and re-appropriation of urban space unknown or highly narrow until the surfacing of the movement. Thus, this article is set out to explore the 15-M Movement in relation to some of its discursive features, its collective action repertoires and its relation with urban space through the example of the «Popular debate on the state of the Nation».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".