MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1813333777 · doi:10.15353/pced.v14i0.52

Community Partnerships: Elgin Business Resource Centre Satellite Office Project

2014· article· en· W1813333777 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marilyn Crewe

Bibliographic record

VenuePapers in Canadian Economic Development · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCommunity Development and Social Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFutures contractGeneral partnershipLeverage (statistics)BusinessStrategic partnershipResource (disambiguation)Public relationsFinancePolitical scienceBusiness administration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Economic Development professionals are challenged every day to do more with less and justify each activity and expenditure. Partnerships become vital to leverage assets and efficiencies and, as a result, reach greater strategic objectives. The need to address identified issues in the community and find strategic partners to meet those needs can pave the road for economic development one business at a time.This environment for opportunity opened the door to attempt a satellite office project between a Community Futures Office, an upper tier municipality and a private company. Through partnership and innovation, entrepreneurs in Elgin County now receive improved access to support and counselling for starting a business and creating jobs. Keywords: partnership, strategy, Community Futures, Elgin County, satellite office

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.835
Threshold uncertainty score0.329

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0890.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePapers in Canadian Economic DevelopmentSame topicCommunity Development and Social ImpactFrench-language works237,207