The Nova Scotia Museum Isle Haute Expedition July 1997 (Curatorial Report #90)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose of the expedition Although Isle Haute has been the subject of moderate investigations in the past, it continues to offer the opportunity to discover new information and to verify older finds. It is an island rich in legend, history, and Mi'kmaq tradition. It is composed of towering geological features and is the home of a curious assemblage of animals and plants. Because of these, the island is of interest to persons working in a variety of disciplines, many of which are represented among the staff of the Nova Scotia Museum. Because the museum was undertaking the study of the island, an invitation was extended to others, who may have been experiencing difficulty in getting to the island, to participate in the expedition. The museum is well positioned to undertake such an endeavour by virtue of its mix of scientific and technical expertise. This report presents the preliminary results of field work conducted on Isle Haute between July 14 and July 18, 1997, and includes references to previous studies. _____________________________________________________________________ Please note: This resource is presented as originally published. The content of older reports may not reflect the current state of knowledge on the topic documented. Please be aware of this when using this resource.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.053 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".