MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1814052672 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2012-0532

Collision-induced spectra and current astronomical research

2013· article· en· W1814052672 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Martin Abel, Lothar Frommhold

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsSpectral lineAtomic physicsHeliumOpacityExcited stateDipoleAstrophysicsComputational physicsAstronomyQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Collision-induced spectra are the spectra of complexes of two or more atoms or molecules in a “fly-by” collisional encounter. Collision-induced absorption (CIA) has been observed in many dense gases and gas mixtures, in most cases at infrared frequencies in the form of quasi continua, and also in liquids and solids. CIA spectra of several binary complexes have been computed using modern quantum chemical methods, combined with molecular scattering theory, which couples the collisional complex to the radiation field as usual in other spectroscopic work. Binary collisional systems, such as H2 interacting with another H2 molecule, or with a helium or hydrogen atom, are first candidates for such computational work, owing to their small number of electrons and the astrophysical interest in such systems. The computed CIA spectra are found to be in close agreement with existing laboratory measurements of such spectra. Laboratory measurements exist at a limited selection of temperatures around 300 K and lower, but theory currently also provides CIA data for temperatures up to 9000 K and for higher frequencies (well into the visible), on a dense grid of temperatures and frequencies. For such calculations, detailed potential energy surfaces (PES) of the supermolecular complexes, along with the induced dipole surfaces (IDS), are needed so that the rotovibrational matrix elements of PES and IDS may be computed for the molecules involved, which may be highly rotovibrationally excited. Modern astronomical research needs opacity tables for analyses of the atmospheres of “cool” objects, such as cool white dwarfs, solar and extrasolar planets and their big moons, cool main sequence stars, and “first” stars, which are briefly described in a concluding section.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateFrench-language works237,207