MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1814246427 · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.09.039

HPV Vaccination in Males: Another Step Forward

2015· letter· en· W1814246427 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tommaso Cai

Bibliographic record

VenueEBioMedicine · 2015
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSemenVaccinationMedicineHPV infectionCohortImmunologyGynecologyInternal medicineCancerAndrologyCervical cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using a clinical trial, Foresta and co-workers showed that the use of prophylactic vaccination against human papillomaviruses (HPV) in patients with HPV semen infection is effective in reducing virus clearance time (Foresta et al., 2015Foresta C. Garolla A. Parisib S. et al.HPV prophylactic vaccination in males improves the clearance of semen infection.ebiomedicine. 2015; 2: 1487-1493Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar). By using randomized controlled trial, they demonstrated in 179 infertile patients from a cohort of 619 that HPV prophylactic vaccination is able to reduce the multiple infections and decrease prevalence of HPV semen infection at 12 months (Foresta et al., 2015Foresta C. Garolla A. Parisib S. et al.HPV prophylactic vaccination in males improves the clearance of semen infection.ebiomedicine. 2015; 2: 1487-1493Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar). On the basis of these findings, they suggested that all patients attending assisted reproduction techniques centers with HPV semen infection may benefit by the union of both specific counseling and available prophylactic vaccination. The results of this trial highlight two important aspects to discuss: 1) the high prevalence of HPV infection in males and the impact of HPV on semen quality and 2) the role of male prophylactic vaccination against HPV. The prevalence of HPV in males ranges from 1.3 to 72.9%, but the majority of studies conducted so far have been performed on specific male populations, such as homosexuals or HIV-infected (Repp et al., 2012Repp K.K. Nielson C.M. Fu R. et al.Male human papillomavirus prevalence and association with condom use in Brazil, Mexico, and the United States.J. Infect. Dis. 2012; 205: 1287-1293Crossref PubMed Scopus (29) Google Scholar). Recently, Bartoletti and coworkers reported a 27% prevalence of HPV in asymptomatic men, highlighting that the HPV infection is often asymptomatic and it allows a greater infection diffusion (Bartoletti et al., 2014Bartoletti R. Cai T. Meliani E. et al.Human papillomavirus infection is not related with prostatitis-related symptoms: results from a case–control study.Int. Braz. J. Urol. 2014; 40: 247-256Crossref PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar). On the other hand, a growing number of clinical trials reported a higher prevalence of HPV infection in semen from infertile patients (Garolla et al., 2013Garolla A. Pizzol D. Bertoldo A. Menegazzo M. Barzon L. Foresta C. Sperm viral infection and male infertility: focus on HBV, HCV, HIV, HPV, HSV, HCMV, and AAV.J. Reprod. Immunol. 2013; 100: 20-29Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (94) Google Scholar, Cai et al., 2014Cai T. Wagenlehner F.M. Mondaini N. et al.Effect of human papillomavirus and Chlamydia trachomatis co-infection on sperm quality in young heterosexual men with chronic prostatitis-related symptoms.BJU Int. 2014; 113: 281-287Crossref PubMed Scopus (34) Google Scholar). In this sense the HPV infection represents an emergent problem for the management of couples eligible for assisted reproduction techniques, too (Foresta et al., 2015Foresta C. Garolla A. Parisib S. et al.HPV prophylactic vaccination in males improves the clearance of semen infection.ebiomedicine. 2015; 2: 1487-1493Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar). In other words, men not only play a key role in the transmission of HPV to women, but they are, probably, one of the targets of HPV viruses. Therefore, little is known about the natural history of HPV infections in men. Extensive knowledge of the natural history of HPV is an absolute requirement when prevention strategies, such as vaccination programs, are designed and implemented. For that reason, this is the time to re-think the role of HPV infection in males. Several authors reported that the spontaneous time of infection clearance of HPV is usually short, even if the consensus among researchers is lacking about this issue (Giuliano et al., 2011Giuliano A.R. Lee J.H. Fulp W. et al.Incidence and clearance of genital human papillomavirus infection in men (HIM): a cohort study.Lancet. 2011; 377: 932-940Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (356) Google Scholar). Giuliano reported that the mean time-to infection clearance (i.e., the time necessary to determine a complete regression in at least 50% of infected subjects) has been estimated to be 5.9 months, while the complete clearance of HPV-DNA in at least 75% of infected subjects has been estimated to occur within 12 months, independently of the HPV genotype considered (Giuliano et al., 2011Giuliano A.R. Lee J.H. Fulp W. et al.Incidence and clearance of genital human papillomavirus infection in men (HIM): a cohort study.Lancet. 2011; 377: 932-940Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (356) Google Scholar). These findings, however, should be viewed in the light of the biological samples collected from patients. On the one hand, Giuliano and co-workers evaluated the HPV-DNA presence by using swabs obtained from the coronal sulcus, glans penis, penile shaft, and scrotum (Giuliano et al., 2011Giuliano A.R. Lee J.H. Fulp W. et al.Incidence and clearance of genital human papillomavirus infection in men (HIM): a cohort study.Lancet. 2011; 377: 932-940Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (356) Google Scholar). Moreover, they did not evaluate the HPV-DNA on the semen. On the other hand, Foresta evaluated the HPV DNA on the semen samples. Semen represents a sampling site of high diagnostic value not only for the assessment of HPV infection in asymptomatic males (Laprise et al., 2014Laprise C. Trottier H. Monnier P. Coutlée F. Mayrand M.-H. Prevalence of human papillomaviruses in semen: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hum. Reprod. 2014; 29: 640-651Crossref PubMed Scopus (58) Google Scholar), but also for the evaluation of the mean time-to infection clearance. Moreover, semen sample analysis for HPV in males shows sufficiently accurate due to higher compliance of patients to sampling procedure, as reported by Kyo et al. (Kyo et al., 1994Kyo S. Inoue M. Koyama M. Fujita M. Tanizawa O. Hakura A. Detection of high-risk human papillomavirus in the cervix and semen of sex partners.J. Infect. Dis. 1994; 170: 682-685Crossref PubMed Scopus (70) Google Scholar). Finally, the role of male prophylactic vaccination against HPV in the management and control of HPV infection diffusion. The main disparity in vaccination rate between males and female is due to the lack of data in the assessment of cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccine use in males (Cifu and Davis, 2014Cifu A.S. Davis A.M. Use of HPV vaccine in males and females.JAMA. 2014; 312: 1920-1921Crossref PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar). Vaccination in males could reduce both the prevalence of cervical cancers and the evidence of HPV-related cancers/genital warts. This aspect has been demonstrated by several randomized control trials with the quadrivalent HPV vaccine that demonstrate robust antibody responses and high efficacy against genital warts anal precancers in men (Stanley, 2014Stanley M. HPV vaccination in boys and men.Hum. Vaccin, Immunother. 2014; 10 (Jul): 2106-2108Crossref PubMed Scopus (77) Google Scholar). However gender-neutral vaccination has been recommended in the USA, Canada, Austria, and Australia. Careful cost effective modeling has preceded these decisions showing that when the burden of disease in men is included in the models then, depending upon coverage, vaccine price, and other factors male vaccination can become cost effective (Stanley, 2014Stanley M. HPV vaccination in boys and men.Hum. Vaccin, Immunother. 2014; 10 (Jul): 2106-2108Crossref PubMed Scopus (77) Google Scholar). Even if the cost-effective analysis is essential in order to diffuse the vaccination in males, the Foresta's study increases our knowledge in the direction of male vaccination program worldwide approval. As future developments we must consider: 1) evaluating the best biological sample to use in order to evaluate the mean time-to infection clearance in males, 2) evaluating the role of prophylactic vaccination against HPV in males to maintain healthy male fertility. Finally, the key messages to take into account are: 1) humoral immunity has a major role in healing from HPV infection; 2) patients positive to HPV semen infection and eligible for assisted reproduction techniques may benefit by the union of both specific counseling and available prophylactic vaccination. I declare no competing interests. HPV Prophylactic Vaccination in Males Improves the Clearance of Semen InfectionSemen represents a reservoir for human papillomavirus (HPV), rising concern in couples eligible for assisted reproduction techniques (ART). Humoral immunity against HPV is considered to protect from reinfection. We investigated the impact of vaccination on virus clearance in a cohort of infertile male patients showing HPV semen infection. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEBioMedicineSame topicCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchFrench-language works237,207