On cognitive small cells in two-tier heterogeneous networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In a two-tier heterogeneous network (HetNet) where small base stations (SBSs) coexist with macro base stations (MBSs), the SBSs may suffer significant performance degradation due to the inter- and intra-tier interferences. Introducing cognition into the SBSs through the spectrum sensing (e.g., carrier sensing) capability helps them detecting the interference sources and avoiding them via opportunistic access to orthogonal channels. In this paper, we use stochastic geometry to model and analyze the performance of two cases of cognitive SBSs in a multichannel environment, namely, the semi-cognitive case and the full-cognitive case. In the semi-cognitive case, the SBSs are only aware of the interference from the MBSs, hence, only inter-tier interference is minimized. On the other hand, in the full-cognitive case, the SBSs access the spectrum via a contention resolution process, hence, both the intra- and intertier interferences are minimized, but at the expense of reduced spectrum access opportunities. We quantify the performance gain in outage probability obtained by introducing cognition into the small cell tier for both the cases. We will focus on a special type of SBSs called the femto access points (FAPs) and also capture the effect of different admission control policies, namely, the open-access and closed-access policies. We show that a semi-cognitive SBS always outperforms a full-cognitive SBS and that there exists an optimal spectrum sensing threshold for the cognitive SBSs which can be obtained via the analytical framework presented in this paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".