MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1814416524 · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/809/1/74

OGLE-2012-BLG-0563Lb: A SATURN-MASS PLANET AROUND AN M DWARF WITH THE MASS CONSTRAINED BY<i>SUBARU</i>AO IMAGING

2015· article· en· W1814416524 on OpenAlexaff
Akihiko Fukui, Andrew Gould, T. Sumi, D. P. Bennett, I. A. Bond, Cheongho Han, Daisuke Suzuki, Jean‐Philippe Beaulieu, V. Batista, A. Udalski, R. A. Street, Y. Tsapras, M. Hundertmark, F. Abe, Aparna Bhattacharya, M. Freeman, Y. Itow, C. H. Ling, Naoki Koshimoto, K. Masuda, Y. Matsubara, Y. Muraki, Koji Ohnishi, L. Philpott, Nicholas J. Rattenbury, To. Saito, D. J. Sullivan, P. J. Tristram, A. Yonehara, J.-Y. Choi, G. W. Christie, D. L. DePoy, Subo Dong, J. Drummond, B. Scott Gaudi, Kyu‐Ha Hwang, A. Kavka, Chung‐Uk Lee, J. McCormick, T. Natusch, H. Ngan, H. Park, Richard W. Pogge, In-Gu Shin, Thiam-Guan Tan, Jennifer C. Yee, M. K. Szyman ́ski, G. Pietrzyn ́ski, I. Soszyn ́ski, R. Poleski, S. Kozłowski, P. Pietrukowicz, K. Ulaczyk, Ł. Wyrzykowski, D. M. Bramich, P. Browne, M. Dominik, K. Horne, С. И. Ипатов, N. Kains, C. Snodgrass, I. A. Steele

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Institutes of Natural SciencesNarodowym Centrum NaukiNational Research Foundation of KoreaChinese Academy of SciencesRoyal Society Te ApārangiQatar FoundationQatar National Research FundNational Research FoundationScience and Technology Facilities CouncilCalifornia NanoSystems InstituteNational Astronomical Observatory of JapanEuropean CommissionJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsPhysicsGravitational microlensingPlanetAstrophysicsExoplanetAstronomyPlanetary systemBrown dwarfSubaru TelescopeTransit (satellite)Planetary massStellar massGalaxySpectrographStar formation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the discovery of a microlensing exoplanet OGLE-2012-BLG-0563Lb with the planet–star mass ratio of . Intensive photometric observations of a high-magnification microlensing event allow us to detect a clear signal of the planet. Although no parallax signal is detected in the light curve, we instead succeed at detecting the flux from the host star in high-resolution JHK '-band images obtained by the Subaru /AO188 and Infrared Camera and Spectrograph instruments, allowing us to constrain the absolute physical parameters of the planetary system. With the help of spectroscopic information about the source star obtained during the high-magnification state by Bensby et al., we find that the lens system is located at 1.3 kpc from us, and consists of an M dwarf (0.34 M ) orbited by a Saturn-mass planet (0.39 M Jup ) at the projected separation of 0.74 AU (close model) or 4.3 AU (wide model). The probability of contamination in the host star's flux, which would reduce the masses by a factor of up to three, is estimated to be 17%. This possibility can be tested by future high-resolution imaging. We also estimate the and colors of the host star, which are marginally consistent with a low metallicity mid-to-early M dwarf, although further observations are required for the metallicity to be conclusive. This is the fifth sub-Jupiter-mass ( ) microlensing planet around an M dwarf with the mass well constrained. The relatively rich harvest of sub-Jupiters around M dwarfs is contrasted with a possible paucity of ∼1–2 Jupiter-mass planets around the same type of star, which can be explained by the planetary formation process in the core-accretion scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations84
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207