MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

La hermenéutica transcultural. La interpretación nietzscheana de las religiones y culturas extraeuropeas

2009· article· es· W181496815 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Johann Figl

Bibliographic record

VenueEstudios Nietzsche · 2009
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicNietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHermeneuticsRelation (database)PhilosophyQuarter (Canadian coin)Center (category theory)HumanitiesEpistemologySociologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En mi artículo quisiera explicar, en primer lugar, algunos ejemplos de los conocimientos tempranos de Nietzsche sobre culturas y religiones extraeuropeas y la metodología histórico-genealógica, estrechamente relacionada con ellas, para centrarme, en segundo lugar, en la «época de la comparación», como una de sus consecuencias. En tercer lugar presentaré sus consecuencias para la concepción del ser humano aplicada por Nietzsche, para analizar, en cuarto y último lugar, la relación entre la nueva hermenéutica filosófica y la transculturalidad de Nietzsche.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.026
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEstudios NietzscheSame topicNietzsche, Schopenhauer, and HegelFrench-language works237,207