MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Political Imposture of Passive Capital

2009· article· en· W1815315307 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Flannigan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Corporate Law Studies · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Law and Human Rights
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapital (architecture)PoliticsPassivityVulnerability (computing)Financial capitalBusinessPolitical capitalPolitical economyEconomicsPolitical scienceEngineeringMarket economyLawElectrical engineeringComputer scienceArtComputer securityHuman capitalVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Considerable political freight attaches to the notion that passive capital is vulnerable. Dimensions of that idea have been important in defining the contours of much corporate regulation. The endorsement or defence of the interests of passive capital, however, may be imposture. It often serves active capital to embrace the vulnerability of passive capital. The legal structure moulded to acknowledge and counterbalance the passivity of passive capital may be exploited to secure the incumbency and objectives of dominant coalitions. Our regulatory designs must be attentive to the potential for the passive capital elevation of active capital.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Corporate Law StudiesSame topicCorporate Law and Human RightsFrench-language works237,207