MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1815381654 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.448

CanMEDS: time to teach the teachers

2013· article· en· W1815381654 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Andrew E. MacNeily

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicNursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics educationComputer sciencePedagogyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

accessible, it will continue to be difficult to champion health advocacy as anything other than "charity work."The same could be said of the communicator, collaborator and manager roles.The ACGME (Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education) outcomes project in the United States has established a toolbox of assessment methods for educators to teach and evaluate core competencies.Considerable effort has been put into faculty development in the form of online teaching modules.4 We should do the same. R Re ef fe er re en nc ce es s1. Leveridge M, Beiko D, Wilson JWL, et al.Health advocacy training in urology:a Canadian survey on attitudes and experience in residency.CUAJ 2007;1: 363-9.2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.536
Threshold uncertainty score0.662

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0030.008
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5360.221

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association JournalSame topicNursing Education, Practice, and LeadershipFrench-language works237,207