MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W181556009 · doi:10.4095/213696

Surficial geology of the Scotian Slope, eastern Canada

2002· report· en· W181556009 on OpenAlexaffabout
David J. W. Piper, D C Campbell

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyArchaeologyGeomorphologyPhysical geographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sediment type on the upper 5 cmof seafloor has been mapped on the Scotian Slope using core samples, acoustic backscatter in sidescan sonar and multibeam bathymetry, observations from submersibles, and high-resolution acoustic profiles. The upper slope is underlain by overconsolidated till with iceberg pits and scours, overlain in water depths of <300mby mobile fine sand in the east and sand and gravel in the west. Muddy fine sand occurs on canyon heads and floors to water depths of about 1000 m. Mudstone outcrops on some canyon walls, with intervening terraces with mud and locally sand deposits. Intercanyon ridge crests <800 mbsl have surface-winnowed sand; similar sand occurs locally on ridge crests to depths of 1500 mbsl. Even low hills in deep water may have winnowed sandy mud at the seabed. The deeper continental slope is generally floored with bioturbated mud changing to foraminifer-rich mud beyond 3000 mbsl. These observations on sediment distribution are important for understanding biological habitat and assessing modern seafloor reworking by currents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLandslides and related hazardsFrench-language works237,207