MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1815659836

MUSAE Lab Research: From Anthropomorphic Speech Technologies to Human-Machine Interfaces and Health Diagnostics Tools

2015· article· en· W1815659836 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Tiago H. Falk

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistère de l'Économie, de l’Innovation et des Exportations du QuébecNuance FoundationRéseau québécois de recherche sur le vieillissementMinistère du Développement Économique, de l’Innovation et de l’ExportationNvidia
KeywordsHuman–machine systemComputer scienceResearch centreEngineering managementEngineeringMultimediaData scienceTelecommunicationsHuman–computer interactionLibrary science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces the Multimedia/Mutimodal Signal Analysis and Enhancement (MuSAE) Laboratory, located at the Institut national de la recherche scientifique (INRS-EMT), University of Quebec, in Montre?al, Que?bec, Canada. The MuSAE Lab conducts award-winning interdisciplinary research at the crossroads of multimedia and biomedical signal processing, with the end-goal of developing innovative anthropomorphic technologies, intelligent human-machine interfaces, and next- generation health diagnostic tools. The ultimate aim of the paper is to highlight the expertise available at the MuSAE Lab, with the end goal of fostering new collaborations and partnerships with related professionals in Canada and abroad.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.214
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207