MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Entropic Fragment‐Based Approach to Aptamer Design

2011· article· en· W1816107362 on OpenAlexaff
Chih‐Yuan Tseng, Mohammad Ashrafuzzaman, Jonathan Y. Mane, Janice Kapty, John R. Mercer, Jack A. Tuszyński

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Biology & Drug Design · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAptamerSystematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichmentComputational biologyDNARNATemplateBinding affinitiesExponential growthMolecular recognitionBiologyChemistryCombinatorial chemistryNanotechnologyComputer scienceBiochemistryGeneticsGeneMaterials scienceMathematicsMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aptamers are short RNA/DNA sequences that are identified through the process of systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment and that bind to diverse biomolecular targets. Aptamers have strong and specific binding through molecular recognition and are promising tools in studying molecular biology. They are recognized as having potential therapeutic and diagnostic clinical applications. The success of the systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment process requires that the RNA/DNA pools used in the process have a sufficient level of sequence diversity and structural complexity. While the systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment technology is well developed, it remains a challenge in the efficient identification of correct aptamers. In this article, we propose a novel information-driven approach to a theoretical design of aptamer templates based solely on the knowledge regarding the biomolecular target structures. We have investigated both theoretically and experimentally the applicability of the proposed approach by considering two specific targets: the serum protein thrombin and the cell membrane phospholipid phosphatidylserine. Both of these case studies support our method and indicate a promising advancement in theoretical aptamer design. In unfavorable cases where the designed sequences show weak binding affinity, these template sequences can be still modified to enhance their affinities without going through the systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical Biology & Drug DesignSame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207